November 2005
Letter to the Trade Minister about Australias role in
opening up service sectors through new methods
Below is the suggested text of a letter to the Trade
Minister. Simply click on the email address to open a new email in your email program,
then copy and paste the text of the letter below into the body of your email, make any
changes you wish, and send!
The Hon Mark Vaile
Minister for Trade
Parliament House
Canberra
Mark.Vaile.MP@aph.gov.au
Dear Minister Vaile,
Australias role in opening up service sectors through new methods
I am concerned about Australias role in the current round of GATS negotiations in
Geneva. There are a number of benchmarking or complementary
proposals on the table to change the way that countries negotiate their GATS commitments
and I understand that Australia has submitted its own proposal.
I am concerned that the proposed changes will force countries to make more and deeper
GATS commitments by forcing a minimum level of commitment across a minimum number of
service sectors. The current structure of GATS allows countries to choose whether and in
which sectors they will make commitments. The website of the Department of Foreign Affairs
and Trade praises this as "different to other WTO Agreements, in that there is not
one rule to which all Members must adhere". This flexible system should not be
undermined by any proposal that requires a mandatory commitment across a certain number of
sectors.
I am particularly concerned that these proposed changes will force countries to open up
their essential service sectors, such as health, education, water, postal,
telecommunications, energy, public transport and audio-visual services. Opening these
services to the market interests of transnational corporations jeopardises the ability of
local firms and public bodies to provide essential services on an equitable basis.
I urge you to withdraw Australias proposal to change the GATS negotiating
process. I also urge you to not support any benchmarking or
complementary approach to the GATS negotiations. Governments should retain the
right to determine the level of their GATS commitments freely and without pressure.
Decisions about essential services should be made democratically at the local and national
level, not signed away behind closed doors.
Yours sincerely,
(Name, Address) |